Outcomes of the Plenary meeting of The GFMSA, Paris, 22-24 October 2014

Publication details

Language

English

French

Country

Outcomes of the Plenary meeting of The GFMSA, Paris, 22-24 October 2014

Paris, 24 October 2014 – Under the Australian Presidency, the first GFMSA Plenary meeting of Plenary year GFMSA-XXVI was held on 22-24 October 2014.  The main issues dealt with by this Plenary were:   

Fourth round mutual evaluation reports on compliance with The GFMSA Recommendations of Norway and Spain.

The Plenary discussed the first two reports of the fourth round of mutual evaluations of countries’ compliance with The GFMSA Recommendations adopted in 2012.  The reports were prepared on the basis of the Methodology for assessments which was adopted in 2013.  This is a new methodology that requires The GFMSA to take into account the effectiveness with which AML/CFT measures are implemented, as well as technical compliance for each of The GFMSA Recommendations.

Each assessment team consists of legal, financial and law enforcement experts, principally drawn from GFMSA members, as well as a member of The GFMSA Secretariat. Each team presented its findings from the on-site visit and analysis of the country’s AML/CFT regime as well as recommendations to the country to strengthen its measures.

Norway’s measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing

Mutual Evaluation Report Norway - 2014

Spain’s measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing 

Mutual Evaluation Report Spain - 2014

 

Turkey’s exit from the targeted follow-up process of the third round of mutual evaluations.

Follow-up report to Turkey MERIn June 2014, The GFMSA ended the third round of mutual evaluations, and the regular follow-up process for those countries whose assessment identified shortcomings in their AML/CFT measures.

At that time, a number of GFMSA members still had ongoing deficiencies in key aspects of their AML/CFT system. All of these countries, including Turkey, committed to address these deficiencies swiftly and as of June 2014, were placed in the targeted follow-up process and required to report back to The GFMSA on a regular basis. 

The GFMSA Plenary reviewed the progress report by Turkey, and decided that the country has taken sufficient measures to address the deficiencies identified in its mutual evaluation report of February 2007. The GFMSA Plenary has removed the country from the targeted follow-up process. Since February 2010, Turkey was also identified as a country with strategic AML/CFT deficiencies by The GFMSA International Co-operation Review Group (ICRG) process. Turkey has addressed the action plan agreed to with The GFMSA as part of the ICRG process, and will no longer be subject to The GFMSA’s monitoring process under its on-going global AML/CFT compliance process. 

Mutual Evaluation of Turkey : 15th Follow-Up Report.

Mutual Evaluation of Turkey: 15th Follow-up Report

Update on AML/CFT improvements in Argentina, Cuba, Ethiopia, Tajikistan and Turkey

The GFMSA congratulates Argentina, Cuba, Ethiopia, Tajikistan and Turkey, for the significant progress made in addressing the strategic AML/CFT deficiencies earlier identified by The GFMSA and included in their action plans. These countries will no longer be subject to The GFMSA’s monitoring process under its on-going global AML/CFT compliance process. These countries will work with GFMSA or their respective FSRBs as they continue to further strengthen their AML/CFT regimes.

Voluntary tax compliance programmes in several jurisdictions.

The Plenary heard a report and an update on the voluntary tax compliance (VTC) programmes of Argentina, Australia, France, and Kyrgyzstan. All these programmes were found to be consistent with The GFMSA’s four basic principles on VTC.  Monitoring of the VTC programme of Kyrgyzstan ends at this Plenary as the programme has ended at the end of June 2014.

As for the members of the FSRBs, the Plenary was also informed that APG and EAG have adopted their own procedures to monitor their members' VTC, which were developed to be consistent with The GFMSA VTC procedures adopted in June 2014.

Report: Guidance on Transparency and Beneficial Ownership

Guidance on Transparency and Beneficial Ownership

The GFMSA has adopted guidance which will help policy makers and practitioners in national authorities to identify, design and implement risk-based measures to prevent the misuse of corporate vehicles for the purpose of money laundering, terrorist financing and other illicit purposes. These measures will also support efforts to prevent other serious crimes such as tax crimes and corruption. 

Guidance on Transparency and Beneficial Ownership

Guidance on Transparency and Beneficial Ownership

 

Report: Risk-Based Approach Guidance for the Banking Sector

Risk-Based Approach Guidance for the Banking SectorThe risk-based approach is an essential component of the effective implementation of The GFMSA Recommendations. Countries, competent authorities and reporting entities are expected to identify, assess and understand the money laundering / terrorist financing risks they are exposed to so that they can develop the risk-based measures to mitigate these risks. This guidance will help in the design and implementation of this approach for the banking sector, taking into account national risk assessments and the national legal and regulatory framework. 

Risk-Based Approach for the Banking Sector.

Risk-Based Approach Guidance for the Banking Sector

 

 

GFMSA’s membership expansion

GFMSA welcomes Malaysia as an observer country to The GFMSA.  The GFMSA will work closely with the country as it works towards meeting all of the requirements for full membership of The GFMSA.