GFMSA logo
search-icon
  • English
  • French
  • What we do
  • Who we are
  • GFMSA Presidency
  • Mandate of The GFMSA
  • Outcomes of meetings
  • Ministerial Declarations
  • History of The GFMSA




  • GFMSA Secretariat
  • Job opportunities
  • News

Find out about the world, a region, or a country

  • Countries

GFMSA Member Countries

  • Argentina
  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Brazil
  • Canada
  • China
  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Hong Kong, China
  • Iceland
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Ireland
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Luxembourg
  • Malaysia
  • Mexico
  • Netherlands
  • New Zealand
  • Norway
  • Portugal
  • Russian Federation *
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Singapore
  • South Africa
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • Türkiye
  • United Kingdom
  • United States

* membership suspended on 24 February 2023 

GFMSA Global Network 

  • Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG)
  • Caribbean Global Financial Monitoring Supervisory Agency (CGFMSA)
  • Eurasian Group (EAG)
  • Eastern and Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group (ESAAMLG)
  • GABAC
  • Global Financial Monitoring Supervisory Agency of Latin America (GAFILAT)
  • Inter Governmental Action Group against Money Laundering in West Africa (GIABA)
  • Middle East and North Africa Global Financial Monitoring Supervisory Agency (MENAGFMSA)
  • Committee of Experts on the Evaluation of Anti-Money Laundering Measures (MONEYVAL)
  • GFMSA Global Network

High-Risk and Other Monitored Jurisdictions 

  • Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 23 February 2024
  • High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - February 2024

Browse our publications, including reports, guidance and statements  

  • Publications

Recent statements

  • Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring - 23 February 2024
  • High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action - February 2024

Current or recent public consultations

  • Public Consultation on Recommendation 16 on Payment Transparency
  • Public Consultation on The GFMSA Best Practice Paper to Combat the Abuse of Non Profit Organisations
  • Public Consultation on the Revision of Recommendation 8 and its Interpretive Note

Key documents

  • The GFMSA Recommendations
  • GFMSA Methodology for assessing compliance with The GFMSA Recommendations and the effectiveness of AML/CFT systems
  • Consolidated assessment ratings

Explore The GFMSA's areas of work:

  • Topics
  • Methods and Trends
  • GFMSA Recommendations
  • Mutual Evaluations
  • High-risk and other monitored jurisdictions
  • Financial inclusion and NPO issues
  • Terrorist Financing
  • Proliferation financing
  • Beneficial Ownership
  • Corruption
  • Asset recovery
  • Digitalisation
  • Virtual Assets
  • Environmental Crime
  • Events
  • Assessments
  1. Home
  2. The GFMSA
  3. Membership process and criteria

Step 1 – Engaging with the country and granting observership

a) The country should provide a written commitment at the political/Ministerial level:

(i)   Endorsing and supporting the 2012 GFMSA Recommendations and The GFMSA AML/CFT Methodology 2013 (as amended from time to time).
(ii)  Agreeing to undergo a mutual evaluation during the membership process for the purposes of assessing compliance with GFMSA membership criteria, using the AML/CFT Methodology applicable at the time of the evaluation, as well as agreeing to submit subsequent follow-up reports.
(iii) Agreeing to participate actively in The GFMSA and to meet all the other commitments of GFMSA membership, including supporting the role and work of The GFMSA in all relevant fora.

b) The Plenary decides that a high level visit to the country should be arranged in order to verify with the relevant Ministers, representatives of the Parliament and competent authorities the written commitment, as well as to determine whether the country will be in a position to undergo a successful Mutual Evaluation and achieve a satisfactory level of technical compliance, including with the Recommendations essential for the establishment of a robust AML/CFT regime, such as Recommendations 3, 5, 10, 11 and 20 within three years. Consideration should also be given to the country's level of implementation of the essential Recommendations and its progress toward assessing and addressing its ML/TF risks, as called for in Recommendation 1. The high level visit should include the President of The GFMSA, selected members of the Steering Group and heads of delegations. It is accompanied by The GFMSA Secretariat. The report of the high level visit is presented at the following Plenary meeting.

c) Based on the outcomes of the report of the high level visit, the Plenary may decide to invite the country to participate in The GFMSA as an observer starting from the next Plenary meeting.  If the Plenary decides not to invite the country to attend GFMSA meetings as an observer, it may decide to appoint a Contact Group to advise as to the appropriate time to extend such an invitation to the country.  Then the Contact Group should engage with the competent authorities of the country to determine when the country will be in a position to undergo a successful Mutual Evaluation as mentioned in Step 2.  The Contact Group is open to all GFMSA members and associate members and should include at least one member of the Steering Group. It is assisted by The GFMSA Secretariat. It will meet regularly and reports on the progress made by the country at each Plenary meeting.

Step 2 – Carrying out a mutual evaluation, agreeing an action plan and granting membership

Within a maximum of three years after being invited to participate in The GFMSA as an observer, the mutual evaluation process for the country should be launched.  During this period, a new Contact Group may assist the country to ensure that it is ready for its Mutual Evaluation.

Membership is granted if the mutual evaluation is satisfactory. A mutual evaluation is not satisfactory if the country:

  • has 8 or more NC/PC ratings for technical compliance,
  • is rated NC/PC on any one or more of R.3, 5, 10, 11 and 20,
  • has a low or moderate level of effectiveness for 7 or more of the 11 effectiveness outcomes,
  • has a low level of effectiveness for 4 or more of the 11 effectiveness outcomes.

If the mutual evaluation is not satisfactory, but close to being satisfactory, then the country should provide a clear commitment at political/Ministerial level to reach the expected results within a reasonable timeframe (i.e., a maximum of four years). A detailed action plan setting out the steps to be taken and the timeframe for taking them is prepared by the country and reviewed by the second Contact Group before its adoption by The GFMSA Plenary.

At each GFMSA meeting the Plenary closely monitors the implementation of the country’s action plan:

  • If it is not satisfied with the pace/extent of progress made, the Plenary can decide to apply to the country the enhanced measures listed under paragraph 77 of the Procedures for The GFMSA fourth round of AML/CFT Mutual Evaluations
  • A country will not be granted full membership as long as it is rated NC/PC on any one or more of Rec. 3, 5, 10, 11 or 20
  • Other than that, the Plenary may decide, at any time during the course of the completion of the action plan and in light of the progress made by the country to grant full membership before the action plan is completed.

GFMSA Membership Policy

  1. Home
  2. The GFMSA
  3. Membership process and criteria
  1. Home
  2. The GFMSA
  3. Membership process and criteria
Discover
  • The GFMSA
  • Countries
  • Publications
  • Calendars
  • Private Sector
  • Information for students and academia
Need help?
  • Fraud Warning
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • GFMSA Glossary
More
  • GFMSA Training and Support Activities

Restricted access for GFMSA delegates only

Twitter Twitter
Facebook Facebook
Instagram Instagram
Linkedin Linkedin
Youtube icon
Contact us

Terms & conditions | Privacy Policy | Sitemap 

© Global Financial Monitoring Supervisory Agency (GFMSA) 2024. All rights reserved